Prompt Security covers a broad range of AI security use cases. Aona goes deep on the employee governance and enablement layer. Here is the difference.
| Feature | Aona | Prompt Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employee AI governance | ||
| AI app security (LLM firewalling) | ||
| Code assistant security | ||
| MCP / Agentic AI security | ||
| AI red teaming | ||
| Employee coaching & upskilling | ||
| Employee AI training journeys | ||
| Shadow AI discovery | ||
| Adoption-positive framing | ||
| Free trial | ✓ (90 days) | ✗ |
| APAC presence |
Prompt Security's breadth is a genuine advantage here. It covers surfaces that Aona does not — LLM firewalling, code assistant security, MCP security, and AI red teaming. If you need all of these in one platform, Prompt Security is the stronger choice.
Aona goes deeper on the employee layer. Prompt Security governs employee AI usage but does not include coaching journeys or AI training modules. If the goal is to change employee behaviour — not just detect and block — Aona is built for that.
Aona's compliance reporting is built around the employee governance picture: who used what, what data was involved, and whether behaviour is improving. Prompt Security's reporting is more security-focused. For board-level AI governance narratives, Aona provides a cleaner story.
Aona has Australian and APAC presence. Prompt Security does not. For organisations in Australia, New Zealand, or APAC that need local compliance support, Aona is the practical choice.
Is Prompt Security better than Aona?
+Can Aona and Prompt Security be used together?
+Does Aona have a free trial?
+What is MCP security and does Aona cover it?
+90-day free trial. No credit card. Runs alongside your existing tools.