Recently, I've had the opportunity to speak with many industry leaders and IT decision-makers about their AI adoption journeys. A recurring theme in these conversations has been the challenge presented by employees using AI tools without official oversight or so-called Shadow AI. Often considered a hidden but pressing issue, Shadow AI has quickly become one of the primary obstacles organisations face when embracing AI technologies.

In 2025, as AI tools have become more accessible and powerful, their unsanctioned use has significantly risen, creating substantial risks around compliance, security, data privacy, and organisational governance. Through this blog, I'll share insights gathered from these discussions, highlighting real-world cases, recent survey data, and practical guidance to manage Shadow AI effectively. We'll explore best practices and strategies to ensure that enterprises can safely harness AI’s transformative power.

Finally, I'll explain how solutions like Aona AI provide comprehensive visibility and control over AI adoption, empowering companies to confidently mitigate Shadow AI risks and leverage the immense potential of artificial intelligence securely and responsibly.

‍

Shadow AI in 2025: Understanding and Tackling the Hidden AI Threat to Enterprises

In the rush to embrace artificial intelligence (AI) for competitive advantage, many organisations have inadverdently opened the door to Shadow AI or the unsanctioned, unauthorised use of AI tools by employees or departments. Much like “shadow IT” before it, Shadow AI involves staff adopting AI apps (think ChatGPT, Copilot, generative image or code tools, etc.) without IT or security’s knowledge or approval . This phenomenon has surged in 2025 as AI tools become easily accessible and more powerful. Recent surveys and real-world cases illustrate why Shadow AI matters: it’s already pervasive and poses serious risks if left unchecked.

Why does Shadow AI matter now? In short, because employees are looking to boost productivity with AI, whether or not official channels exist. From drafting emails and writing code to analyzing data, workers find these tools invaluable and often adopt them spontaneously.

A recent study by Palo Alto shows that about half of employees are using AI tools at work without approval. In customer-facing roles the number is similar – nearly 50% of customer service agents admit to using unsanctioned AI tools to help with their jobs (Zendesk).

Worryingly, a 2024 LinkedIn report found 53% of employees hide their AI usage from bosses for fear of seeming replaceable. In other words, much of this AI adoption is happening in the shadows. Even when companies ban or restrict AI, it often doesn’t stop determined staff – 46% say they would continue using these tools even if explicitly banned (Palo alto networks). This reality leaves CIOs and CISOs in a bind: Shadow AI is here, and simply prohibiting it is both impractical and ineffective.

‍

‍

‍

The Risks Shadow AI Poses to Enterprises

While Shadow AI may spring from positive intentions (like efficiency and innovation), it introduces a host of enterprise risks across compliance, privacy, security, governance, and reputation:

• Data  Leaks and Privacy Violations:

‍ Unapproved AI use can lead to sensitive data being uploaded to external platforms outside the company’s control. Employees may paste confidential code, customer records, or strategic plans into AI prompts without realising that data could be stored or used to train third-party models. In early023, for example, Samsung engineers inadvertently leaked proprietary source code and meeting notes by querying ChatGPT, prompting the firm to ban such tools afterward. If personal data or intellectual property is exposed in this way, it can breach privacy laws and contractual obligations. alarmingly, 38% of AI-using employees have admitted to inputting sensitive work information into AI tools without their employer’s knowledge. Cisco’s 2024 data privacy report likewise found 48% of workers entered non-public company info into generative AI ....a compliance nightmare in the making.

• Regulatory and Compliance Challenges:

‍ Shadow AI can easily run afoul of industry regulations and data protection mandates. When staff share data with an unsanctioned AI service, regulatory obligations can be ignored. For instance, sending customer financial data to an AI tool might violate GDPR, HIPAA, or NDAs if the tool isn’t vetted. Organisations in regulated sectors (finance, healthcare, government, etc.) face serious legal consequences if oversight is lacking. In fact, governance experts are increasingly concerned about intellectual property and compliance risks. As highlighted by J.P. Morgan, Generative Al Report, 2024 study which found 30% of organisations worry about IP infringement due to generative AI use.

• Security Vulnerabilities:

The use of unvetted AI apps can introduce malware or other cybersecurity threats. Employees might unknowingly use a fake or compromised AI tool, opening the door to attackers. Unapproved browser extensions or AI integrations could siphon data or credentials. There’s also risk in the output: AI-generated code snippets might contain vulnerabilities or insecure practices. Without proper controls, shadow AI can bypass existing security defenses and monitoring, creating new blind spot. A recent analysis revealed that the vast majority of workplace AI queries are run through personal accounts (e.g. personal ChatGPT logins) rather than corporate instances, making it harder to apply enterprise security controls. Data loss prevention (DLP) tools have noted that over a quarter of data submitted to chatbots is sensitive, and this share jumped 156% in one year which indicates a rapidly growing leakage risk.

• Lack of Governance and Accountability:

Shadow AI means AI is being used without oversight, standards or documentation. Models might be making decisions or generating content that managers aren’t even aware of. This lack of governance can lead to inconsistent practices, bias or errors going unchecked, and difficulty auditing decisions later (since inputs/outputs may not be recorded). It undermines enterprise AI governance frameworks and can derail efforts to maintain transparency and ethical AI use. As Zendesk’s research notes, shadow AI tools often operate in isolation and produce outputs of inconsistent quality, which can harm customer trust or employee reputations. Inconsistency and the possibility of AI “hallucinations” (confident but incorrect outputs) mean reputational damage is a real concern (e.g. an AI-written customer response with false information could embarrass the company).

• Reputation and Trust:

If a data leak or compliance breach occurs via Shadow AI, the company’s reputation can suffer. Customers and partners lose trust when hearing that sensitive data was mishandled or that rogue AI tools led to a mistake. Moreover, employees’ trust in leadership can erode if they feel forced to “go rogue” to get their jobs done efficiently. Cultural impacts are at play: shadow AI might indicate an innovative spirit, but it also signals a breakdown in the alignment between employees and IT policies. A divided approach to AI (where leadership and staff aren’t on the same page) can even create internal tension. In one survey from Writer, half of executives said AI was “tearing their company apart” due to such power struggles and misalignment. Clearly, unmanaged AI adoption can become not just a technical risk, but a broader organisational and cultural challenge.

‍

‍

Best Practices for Detecting and Managing Shadow AI

To address Shadow AI, organisations should resist any impulse to simply ban all AI. As we’ve seen, outright bans often fail (users find workarounds) and they forfeit the productivity gains of AI. Instead, the goal should be to bring Shadow AI into the light by enabling responsible use through a combination of policy, education, and technology safeguards. Below are several best practices and solutions for detecting, managing, and governing Shadow AI in the enterprise:

• Establish Clear AI Governance and Policy:

Start by defining what “acceptable AI use” looks like in your organisation. Develop an AI usage policy that sets boundaries on data sharing (e.g. no confidential data in public AI), approved tools, and prohibited practice. This policy should be practical and actionable, not just abstract principles. Consider forming a cross-functional AI governance committee (including IT, security, legal, compliance, and business units) to evaluate new AI tools quickly and consistently. A formal policy and governance framework establishes accountability and makes expectations clear, creating a foundation for compliant AI adoption. Regularly review and update these guidelines as AI technology and regulations evolve.

• Monitor and Detect Shadow AI Usage:

You can’t protect what you can’t see. Invest in tools and processes to discover AI applications active in your environment– both approved and unapproved. This might involve enabling logs or using a cloud access security broker (CASB) to flag connections to popular AI service, scanning network traffic for calls to AI APIs, and deploying data loss prevention rules to catch sensitive content heading out to AI platforms By building a real-time inventory of which AI tools are in use and by whom, IT teams can identify “rogue” AI activity and assess its risk. Leading organisations are turning to AI  observability solutions that track usage across thousands of AI apps for exactly this purpose. Comprehensive monitoring not only reveals Shadow AI, it provides data (e.g. frequency of use, types of data involved) to inform smarter AI strategy and risk assessments going forward.

• Enforce Data Protection and Access Controls:

To mitigate the risks of Shadow AI, implement technical guardrails that prevent sensitive data from leaking even if employees do use external AI. For example, advanced solutions such as Aona AI can automatically redact or block confidential information in AI prompts.

By integrating data classification, with AI tools, you can ensure, say, any attempt to feed customer PII or proprietary code into a chatbot is stopped or sanitized. Zero-trust principles are also key: restrict AI tools’ access to only the data and systems absolutely required for their function. This might mean using proxy accounts or API gateways that mediate AI access to corporate data, and enforcing least-privilege permissions for any AI integration.

Regularly audit usage logs for policy violations or anomalies (e.g. large data downloads after an AI query. In short, put security checkpoints in place so that even if Shadow AI usage occurs, it cannot freely tap into crown-jewel data or bypass identity protections. With strong data protection policies and automated enforcement, organisations can significantly reduce the likelihood of a costly breach.

• Provide Sanctioned, Secure AI Alternatives:

One reason Shadow AI flourishes is because employees feel they need these tools and lack approved options. Closing the gap requires offering enterprise-sanctioned AI solutions that employees want to use. This could involve deploying vetted enterprise versions of generative AI tools (with enterprise-grade security and privacy), or building internal AI assistants for common use cases (so data stays in-house). By channeling demand into approved platforms, companies can maintain oversight and apply safeguards. Make it easy for staff to access these sanctioned AI tools, and clearly communicate that these are the “safe” choices.

Additionally, create secure sandboxes or experimentation environments where teams can explore new AI tech on trial basis under monitoring When people have a convenient, compliant way to get AI capabilities, they are less likely to resort to unapproved apps. In fact, many leading firms have set up an AI Center of Excellence or innovation sandbox to encourage responsible experimentation – allowing the business to reap AI’s benefits without skirting governance.

• Educate and Empower Employees:

‍Human awareness is one of the best defenses against Shadow AI risks. Training programs should educate employees on the risks and consequences of unsanctioned AI use (e.g. data leaks, regulatory fines, security breaches) It’s crucial to debunk misconceptions – for instance, many users mistakenly believe their prompts to a public AI are private, when in reality providers may store and review that data.

Teach staff how to use AI tools safely: what types of data are off-limits, how to spot questionable tools or outputs, and where to find internal guidance. Regular workshops, guidelines, and an open channel for questions will foster a security-first  culture around AI. Encourage employees to “stop and  think” before pasting data into an AI service.

By making AI governance part of the company culture – not just a top-down mandate – you turn your workforce into allies for compliance. When employees understand that management isn’t trying to stifle innovation but to protect them and the business, they’re more likely to buy into using AI responsibly.

As one industry CEO aptly put it, managing Shadow AI is “not about saying no to AI, it’s about helping your organisation say yes with confidence.”

By implementing these best practices – governance, visibility, controls, enablement, and education – enterprises can shine alight on Shadow AI without dimming the innovative spark. The aim is to create a balanced approach: support the productive use of AI while meeting security, privacy, and compliance obligations. In doing so, IT leaders transform Shadow AI from a lurking threat into an opportunity for smart, governed AI adoption.

‍

Aona AI: A Comprehensive Solution for Shadow AI Governance

Managing Shadow AI at scale can be challenging. This is where dedicated platforms like Aona AI step in – providing a unified solution to monitor, control, and enable AI usage securely across the enterprise. Aona AI’s value proposition is built around mitigating Shadow AI risks and empowering organisations to adopt AI safely. It offers end-to-end capabilities that align with the best practices above:

• Full AI Usage Visibility

Aona AI delivers real-time observability into employee interactions with 5000+ AI applications – from popular chatbots to code assistant. This comprehensive AI discovery means CIOs and CISOs get a centralised view of which tools are being used, how often, and what data is at play. By pinpointing Shadow AI activity early, you can proactively address unsanctioned tools before they cause trouble.

• Data Leak Prevention and Guardrails:

At the core of Aona’s platform is an advanced AI data protection firewall. It comes with pre-trained guardrail models to identify and prevent sensitive data leaks through AI channel. In practice, Aona can block or redact  confidential information on-the-fly if an employee tries to input something like personal identifiers, source code, or financial details into an AI prompt. These automated guardrails enforce your policies 24/7, ensuring compliance and privacy are maintained even when people use generative AI. By stopping the “oops” moments before they happen, Aona AI dramatically lowers the risk of breaches via Shadow AI.

• Employee  Upskilling and Engagement:

Uniquely, Aona AI doesn’t just play defense – it also helps bring employees up to speed with safe AI practices. The platform includes tools for user education and coaching in realtime For example, if an employee’s action is blocked, Aona can explain why and suggest a compliant alternative. This approach turns enforcement into a learning opportunity, gradually building a culture of responsible AI use. By engaging users directly with personalized  guidance, Aona reduces the burden on security teams (fewer repeated alerts) and fosters a more informed workforce.

• Governance  and Compliance Management:

Aona AI helps organisations stay ahead of emerging AI regulations and standards. It provides out-of-the-box compliance rule sets (“AI compliance packs”) that map to frameworks  like data privacy laws or AI ethics guidelines. Companies can customize these policies and track adherence down to the individual employee level. This compliance manager capability means you can demonstrate proper AI oversight to auditors and avoid regulatory missteps. Aona essentially serves as a central  AI governance hub – enforcing rules, logging usage, and adapting as policies change.

• Seamless Integration and Deployment:

Designed for enterprise environments, Aona’s solution integrates smoothly whether on-premises or in cloud setups. It uses APIs to hook into your existing security stack (SIEM, DLP, identity management) for comprehensive data  protection without disrupting workflows. This ensures that adopting Aona AI is straightforward for IT teams and yields immediate security benefits without hindering innovation.

In conclusion, Shadow AI doesn’t have to be the Achilles’ heel of your AI strategy. With the right governance mindset and tools like Aona AI, organisations can mitigate shadow usage and turn it into safe, sanctioned productivity. By combining policy, culture, and technology, IT decision-makers can enable secure and compliant AI adoption– reaping AI’s rewards while sleeping soundly about the risks. As we move deeper into 2025, those enterprises that master Shadow AI management will be the ones to fully harness AI’s transformative potential with confidence and control.